On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:39 AM, richardcur...@googlemail.com <richardcur...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> GWT for example does real obfuscation and the shrinking results are > impressive. Especially local variables etc. can be highly obfuscated. JS compilation (as distinct from just obfuscation) really works best as an offline process (e.g. http://jscompiler.org/) as it can do substitutions and various renamings. It's worth working out if you can cut down on the dynamism of the JS you are serving so you can statically compile it once and avoid having to do that work for every request. Dave. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
