Ok, thank you for the response. I was just worried i was missing something obvious. My method of keeping only the title property as searchable model, and the rest of the fields as normal DB models does work fine, just didn't seem the most efficient way to do it. but it looks like that is the way to go. thank you for the response!
On May 12, 3:35 am, baytiger <troels...@gmail.com> wrote: > TextProperty and BlobProperty are ALREADY not indexed. So it doesn't > make any difference. > > The problem with the searchable model is that it makes a few extra > rows in your database that contains among other things a list of all > the words that appear in your TextProperty. This means that it runs > out of indexes and explodes and gives you the too many indexes error. > > There is no way around this. Its, unfortunately, a pitfall of the > system. I think we can assume that Google is working on it. But nobody > knows when it will be ready. It is likely that their database > structure was not built for such large indexes. > > On May 12, 1:57 am, Ben <bhym...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I thought maybe the 1.2.2 update with the addition of "indexed=false" > > would solve this problem for me, but it doesn't seem to have any > > effect. I can move the title into a separate property is i mentioned > > above and that works ok, but i feel like i must be missing some other > > obvious solution here. my property is set like so: > > > ----- > > class Item(search.SearchableModel): > > title = db.StringProperty(required=True) > > category = db.IntegerProperty() > > product = db.IntegerProperty() > > priority = db.IntegerProperty() > > description = db.TextProperty(indexed=False) > > contributors = db.StringProperty() > > ----- > > > any ideas? > > > On May 9, 12:20 am, 风笑雪 <kea...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > SDK 1.2.2 can use "indexed=False" parameter on property constructor now. > > > > 2009/5/9 Ben <bhym...@gmail.com> > > > > > I didn't figure out what was causing the problem, but i solved it by > > > > moving my "Title" string prop to a separate searchable class with a > > > > reference property, and leaving the "description" in a standard db > > > > model. might not work for everyone but solved my problem. thanks for > > > > the help. > > > > > On May 8, 10:11 am, Devel63 <danstic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > You should be able to have a searchable TextProperty and a > > > > > StringProperty. I do. If the advice below doesn't help, try posting > > > > > your class definition here. > > > > > > On May 7, 10:27 am, ryan > > > > > <ryanb+appeng...@google.com<ryanb%2bappeng...@google.com>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/queriesandinde. > > > > .. > > > > > > describes this error. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
