done.  here's the link:

http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1912



On Jul 27, 7:02 pm, jonathan <jricket...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also have the same problem. I remember asking about it a while ago
> and was told that it was a known shortcoming. I forgot to log it at
> the time as a defect. If you log it, I'm definitely interested and
> will star it.
>
> j
>
> On Jul 28, 10:43 am, BenNevile<ben.nev...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I have an app where users create an account, and then can access the
> > service throughwww.mywebsite.com/account_id.  Awesome!  But not so
> > awesome for the Current Load table that's on my dashboard, since
> > having the account_id as part of the URI and not a parameter means
> > that it doesn't aggregate stats in a meaningful way.  No one URI has
> > much of a meaningful load, even though something like /.*/settings
> > might account for 50% of all the requests.
>
> > Am I stupid to be structuring my URIs this way?  It seems reasonable
> > to me.  It would be boss if this URI table was based on the mappings
> > we declare in our app.
>
> > Ben
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to