On Aug 7, 1:33 am, "Nick Johnson (Google)" <nick.john...@google.com>
wrote:
> Queries fetch the entities in parallel - as do bulk gets. Thus, the
> time taken for the entity-fetching part of a query or a bulk get is
> proportional to the time required to fetch the slowest entity (plus
> some overhead transmitting the response back), not linear with the
> number of entities.
Right, but that doesn't explain why queries takes *shorter* time than
a bulk get!
On Aug 7, 2:24 am, Alkis Evlogimenos ('Αλκης Ευλογημένος)
<evlogime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The problem is that you are *not* doing a multi-get for the get 20 case. You
> do 20 gets sequentially.
How so? Is db.get(list()) not a parallel get?
Oliver
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
