On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Jason C <jason.a.coll...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Some of our architectural designs are contemplating daily taskqueue > jobs in the millions. > > What sort of reaction does this bring from Google? Is this within the > realm of possibility (current quota limitations aside), or completely > not what taskqueue is contemplating? > This is certainly a use-case we aim to support. The current limit of 100k tasks a day for billing enabled apps is temporary. -Nick Johnson > > j > > On Sep 8, 4:31 am, "Nick Johnson (Google)" <nick.john...@google.com> > wrote: > > Hi Kaz, > > With the 1.2.5 release, the Task Queue quota has been increased to 100k > per > > day for billed apps. Is this likely to be enough for your short-term > > requirements? > > > > -Nick Johnson > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 11:49 AM, kaz <kazunori...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hello Nick, > > > > > I'm writing a production code on GAE/J for a collabolation tool called > > > Colabolo, which will be updated this month. We've been using Rails > > > until now and are moving to GAE/J on the next update. > > > > >http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/21/colabolo-takes-another-stab-at-t. > .. > > > > > Almost all the porting has been done and we got a last one challenge > > > which can be a show stopper. I was very pleased when I hear the news > > > about 1.2.5 release with TQ, since it can be a silver bullet to solve > > > our problem. > > > > > But I just found that there's a 10,000 tasks/day limitation which > > > means it is impossible to use on production. While we understand that > > > TQ is an experimental, we'd like to use it on our new update to > > > demonstrate the power of the cloud to our users and executives (and we > > > can rollback to the old implementation anytime when we find any > > > gritches on TQ implementation). > > > > > So can you consider changing quotas for TQ for our apps? The app ids > > > are: > > > > > colabolo-gae > > > colabolo-gae-qa > > > colabolo-gae-dev > > > colabolo-gae-dev2 > > > > > If you can allow us to use somethinglike 1M/day tasks, we can make > > > each task short and fine grained. We look forward to your reply. > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Kaz > > > > > On 8ζ28ζ₯, εεΎ9:16, "Nick Johnson (Google)" <nick.john...@google.com> > > > wrote: > > > > Hi Brian, > > > > We'll be increasing the limit across the board in the near future. If > you > > > > think you have a compelling use case for getting your limit raised > early, > > > > please let me know in a private email what you need it for. > > > > > > -Nick Johnson > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Brian <bsmcconn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > I was wondering if we can get our Task Queue quota increased. We > have > > > > > seen a substantial increase in usage, and are getting close to the > 10K > > > > > limit (we use it to run small background tasks that increase > > > > > proportionally with usage). Our app IDs are worldwidelexicon and > > > > > wwlapi > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > Brian McConnell > > > > > > -- > > > > Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine > > > > -- > > Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine > > > -- Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
