+1 here. - ryan.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Gijsbert <gijsbert.de.h...@gmail.com>wrote: > > I'm also interested. > > On Oct 13, 10:24 am, bFlood <bflood...@gmail.com> wrote: > > bump... > > > > On Oct 12, 12:25 pm, "twink*" <john.tur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Add my name to the list of people that would consider paying to always > > > keep at least one instance warm. > > > > > On Oct 12, 8:43 am, bFlood <bflood...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > hello > > > > > > I noticed in the Oct 7 chat that Google is considering(?) allowing > > > > developers paid-for warm instances of your app. > > > > > > "If you're interested in being able to pay for at least one instance > > > > to be kept > > > > warm, even with sporadic bursts of traffic, let us know in the > > > > discussion group and issue tracker." > > > > > > I guess the main question on everyone's mind is how much? a single > > > > python instance has to be an order of magnitude less expensive then > > > > say a small EC2 VM so I'd be interested to hear what the > daily/weekly/ > > > > monthly costs would be. > > > > > > cheers > > > > brian > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
