Just checking the status of this. My app was moved to the 1.2.5 server yesterday after this started happening. The 1.2.6 release is out, so I'm wondering if my app (jacob-6) is on 1.2.6 or still on 1.2.5?
Barry On Oct 13, 5:24 pm, RollingCircle <e.j.hard...@gmail.com> wrote: > At the moment, even a quick "Whoops - we're on the case" sticky thread > on the forum from the Google team would be a comfort. > > We've all had deployments which didn't go as smoothly as we'd hoped, > but when they don't, communication with affected parties is vital. > > Otherwise, we're left to assume the team are all huddled underneath > desks at Google Towers, adopting the foetal position, eyes closed, > rocking backwards and forwards, chanting "There's no place like > home...There's no place like home...." > > So come on chaps...comms check? > > On Oct 13, 11:47 pm, jonathan <jricket...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I would have to imagine, that Google intends to have a reliable > > service here and that the release of 1.2.6 has been problematic. I > > would like to push for a review of this release once it is finished. > > There have been many problems caused to applications, that as you say > > is completely unexpected and that causes significant concern. > > > One possible solution is to allow applications to opt-in to a staging > > version:http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1078. > > A more generic version of this solution is for google to keep multiple > > versions of GAE in production, rather than upgrading everyone, allow > > individuals to 'opt-in' to a specific version of app-engine. > > > This would then feel more like you were running on your own server > > with some control over the software installed, and you could test out > > the upgrade, and it's effects on YOUR application before it occurs. > > > j > > > On Oct 14, 5:16 am, johnP <j...@thinkwave.com> wrote: > > > > Rodrigo, > > > > Thanks for the response - I have replaced the module with one that > > > builds the tables dynamically - > > > > But as we were discussing internally this morning: are we dealing with > > > a Tactical or a Strategic issue, here. The fact that we can have the > > > carpet pulled out from under us at any moment, with no recourse, is > > > really an untenable position for establishing a business. > > > > johnP > > > > On Oct 13, 11:07 am, Rodrigo Moraes <rodrigo.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:56 PM, johnP wrote: > > > > > OK, folks. Please let me know what to do in the contingency where I > > > > > have an application that is functioning; have paying customers; then > > > > > after a change on Google's side - it stops functioning; and when I try > > > > > to contact people at Google, I get radio silence? > > > > > johnP > > > > > johnP, > > > > the immediate solution for your issue would be to rebuild the files > > > > with cached pickles. > > > > > -- rodrigo > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
