Does it mean that indexing overhead like you call this is about 500 times...?
On Oct 20, 3:43 pm, "Nick Johnson (Google)" <nick.john...@google.com> wrote: > Hi, > The difference you're seeing is due to indexing overhead. Removing composite > indexes and setting fields as indexed=False will substantially reduce your > index consumption. > > -Nick Johnson > > > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 5:49 AM, _RT_ <r...@daparty.ru> wrote: > > > I have a simple application that stores some records (4 integer > > fields). For now it's over 40k records in datastore. > > > Datastore statistic says: > > > Last updated Total number of entities Size of all entities > > 3:17:33 ago 41,800 4 MBytes > > > But in dashboard I seeing: > > > Stored Data $0.005/GByte-day 0% 2.41 of 801.00 > > GBytes $0.01 / > > $4.00 > > > So, what happen? It's so bad, because I need store 3,5 million records > > (with this trend it's over . How can I reduce Stored Data resource? > > -- > Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine > Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: > 368047 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
