Can't speak for others, but our load times have gone from on average 3-4 seconds from cold to 1-2 seconds, since the outage. The instances seem to live longer as well, but most importantly the cold start has been *much* better since then.
On Feb 26, 7:11 pm, "Ikai L (Google)" <ika...@google.com> wrote: > No, the outage wasn't related to a performance upgrade. There are any number > of reasons why your application isn't being cycled out. I'm curious as to > whether other users see this or if they see the opposite effect. > > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Blake <blakecaldw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I was seeing 7 second load times for my first request back into the > > system after the JVM (must have) went to sleep. Now it's super fast, > > as if the JVM wasn't sleeping. This is really great. > > > Is anyone else seeing this too? I wonder if the outage was a side > > effect of a big performance push. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google App Engine" group. > > To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- > Ikai Lan > Developer Programs Engineer, Google App > Enginehttp://googleappengine.blogspot.com|http://twitter.com/app_engine -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
