I think a specific "App Engine" tag in a general Web App Gallery would make more sense than what we had before. After all, what you can do with App Engine is pretty much the same than what you can do with other technology stacks, and much of what the user experiences is the common client-side part anyway.
On Nov 7, 6:21 am, nickmilon <nickmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also the gallery was a kind of museum where you could see how GAE > appls have been evolved in time from the early days circa April 2008 > till now, always advancing using new features of the platform or as > the features were understood by the developers. > Now if they even do substitute this with a new site I doubt early > developers will go and resubmit their work. > So I only hope Google reconsiders this, fixes the problems related to > spam and classification of appls and restore the site. > > On Nov 6, 5:17 am, Julian Namaro <namarojul...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > An App Gallery is a great idea but Google's one looked like a weekend > > project thrown out in the wild and was pretty useless. > > There was a lot of spam, unhelpful reviews, and occasionally you could > > see Desktop software (running only on Windows, not even cross- > > plateform) with a whole bunch of 5-stars ratings in this "App Engine" > > gallery. > > > My guess is that they're deprecating the gallery in favor of the > > Chrome Web Store. Hope this will be a more serious attempt :] > > > On Nov 5, 6:14 am, MLTrim <michele.trimar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Do you know why App Gallery is no longer available? > > > >http://appgallery.appspot.com > > > > thanks > > > Michele > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
