Yeah, if you need to be able to allow some requests without cookies to
a 'secure' url you'll need to use a lower-level solution like those.
The options in app.yaml are higher-level.


Robert





On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 00:17, Silencer <devassyh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Robert ,
>
> Those solutions look better coding to me.
>
> So i will have to anyway remove login:admin for URL's destined to be
> used for Cross Domain Resource Sharing.
>
> Even login:required will also fail right ?
> Because preflight request is never send with cookies.
>
> So basically i have to implement url securing myself.
>
>
>
> On Jan 17, 11:19 pm, Robert Kluin <robert.kl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Securing your URLs in code is OK, provided you're doing it
>> consistently perhaps using a decorator, or in a base AdminHandler.
>> This will let you allow some calls or respond differently to non-admin
>> calls.
>>
>> You might also want to check out the users.is_current_user_admin() function.
>>    http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/users/functions.html
>>
>> And, I would also suggest looking at the @login_required decorator.
>> You could just write a @admin_required decorator.
>>    http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/webapp/utilmodule....
>>
>> Robert
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:33, Silencer <devassyh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > i have two apps let us call it app1 and app2 ;
>>
>> > Assume that i have logged in as admin in both apps.
>> > in my work-flow i have to do a POST request from app1 rendered page
>> > (http://app1.appspot.com/sourcepage )
>> > to and apps url (http://app2.appspot.com/updatedata) .
>>
>> >http://app2.appspot.com/updatedatais a url secured by login:admin in
>> > the app.yaml file
>>
>> > Now in FF3.6 , when such an ajax request is done using jQuery ,
>> > FF3.6 will first send a Preflighted request ( OPTIONS request ) .
>> > This request is sent without cookies.
>> > So appengine returns a redirect as response.
>> > Although i have implemented the options(self) function for the
>> > request, the control never reaches there
>>
>> > So the original POST is not send at all.
>>
>> > i read in some article that the credentials will not be sent with the
>> > Preflighted request
>> > So in that case is there a way to make options request alone to pass
>> > through for admin urls ?
>>
>> > TO get my workflow done at last i removed login:admin from app.yaml
>> > and
>> > checks for user logged in and compare email id's to a set of allowed
>> > admins.
>> > I know it is  bad programming , but still.
>>
>> > Is there any thing that i miss ?
>>
>> > Please help
>>
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> > "Google App Engine" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> > For more options, visit this group 
>> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Google App Engine" group.
> To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Reply via email to