I understand that AlwaysOn is still under discussion, but I'd just like to point out that the old pricing model suggested that having an idle instance costs around 0.4c/hr (0.3 / 3 / 24) while in the new model, it costs 5c/hr (reserved instance). The old price might not be sustainable, but a 12x jump in price is a bit dramatic IMHO.
The other thing I'd like to suggest is to restore the free email quota to 2000 for paying apps. This way Google can both block off free rider spammer and not look like a cheap as. On May 24, 3:51 pm, "Gregory D'alesandre" <gr...@google.com> wrote: > I'm still monitoring and working on getting more complete answers to the > questions raised, thanks for the pointer though! > > Greg > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Marc Hede <marcdh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If anyone is still monitoring this topic, and interested in asking > > questions about Python concurrency on App Engine, please see this topic > > here: > > >http://code.google.com/appengine/forum/python-forum.html?place=topic%... > > > This may also benefit Java developers to but it is mainly geared towards > > Python runtime specifically. > > > Best > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google App Engine" group. > > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
