Any news on this potential fix? On Thursday, 28 July 2011 19:56:22 UTC+1, Justin Haugh wrote: > > Not at the moment, but we're working on a fix for this, so that a channel > created by a frontend can be used by a backend, and vice-versa. I can't > provide an exact release date at this point, but it likely will be in one > of the next few releases. > > Until then, the suggested method of handling this is to have either your > frontend or backend be responsible for Channel communication, and use > another mechanism for communication between FE and BE, such as urlfetch, > memcache, the datastore, or the task queue. > > Justin >
On Thursday, 28 July 2011 19:56:22 UTC+1, Justin Haugh wrote: > > Not at the moment, but we're working on a fix for this, so that a channel > created by a frontend can be used by a backend, and vice-versa. I can't > provide an exact release date at this point, but it likely will be in one > of the next few releases. > > Until then, the suggested method of handling this is to have either your > frontend or backend be responsible for Channel communication, and use > another mechanism for communication between FE and BE, such as urlfetch, > memcache, the datastore, or the task queue. > > Justin > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/0dNrXhs8CowJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
