OH - but don't worry....everything is still fine 
at http://code.google.com/status/appengine - so there isn't any *real* 
problem</sarcasm>

-Nathan

On Friday, March 23, 2012 1:28:56 PM UTC-6, toonetown wrote:
>
> What goes around comes around, I guess.... http://appengine.google.comhangs 
> for a long time (about a minute) and then throws up a server error...
>
> How much do you want to bet it's throwing "DeadlineExceededException"?  :)
>
> -Nathan
>
> On Wednesday, March 14, 2012 9:42:21 AM UTC-6, Mos wrote:
>>
>> Problem still exists: High latency and a significant number of requests 
>> fail or result in uncontrolled creation of new instances.
>>
>> GAE customers complain and complain for days.  It seems like many website 
>> have to accept that the 500-error is an integral feature of the GAE 
>> run-time.
>> Even worse:  The broken platform leads to increase usage of instances and 
>> therefore leads to higher costs for paying customer.
>>
>> No communication from Google; no feedback on the mailing list; no status 
>> updates on the issue tracker. 
>> Instead a always green status:   
>> http://code.google.com/status/​​appengine<http://code.google.com/status/appengine>
>>      
>> (I think the GAE community needs to develop a crowed sources status page to 
>> get a picture what's really is going on)
>>
>> That makes me crazy.  I saw many platforms and business support forums 
>> the last years, but never encountered such an ignorance regarding custom 
>> complains. 
>>
>> The only official response I saw, was the "Escalated your issue to the 
>> reliability team" in one of the related issues:
>> http://code.google.com/p/​​googleappengine/issues/detail?​​id=7133<http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=7133>
>>  
>>
>> So, 'realiability team' what's going on? How is the status?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Mos <mosa...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> > What is your application id?
>>>
>>> krisen-talk    (www.krisentalk.de)
>>>
>>>
>>> > Feel free to open a production issue
>>>
>>> There is already an issue from someone else (following this thread a lot 
>>> of people are affected):
>>>
>>> http://code.google.com/p/​​googleappengine/issues/detail?​​id=7133<http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=7133>
>>>
>>> Johan, what's going on with GAE the last days?  It doesn't feel like a 
>>> PaaS in production mode.
>>> Perhaps Google should reintroduce the Beta status. ;)  
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Johan Euphrosine <pro...@google.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> What is your application id?
>>>>
>>>> Feel free to open a production issue, if you want to investigate this 
>>>> offthread:
>>>>
>>>> http://code.google.com/p/​​googleappengine/issues/entry?​​template=Production%20issue<http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/entry?template=Production%20issue>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Mos <mosa...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Same thing the last minutes on our app (HRD, Java, Low-Traffic, one 
>>>>> instance, no new deployment, simple page just hitting MemCache):
>>>>>
>>>>> "Request was aborted after waiting too long to attempt to service your 
>>>>> request."   -->  User sees 500er
>>>>>
>>>>> GAE-Team, what is going on the last days?  In my opinion the Google 
>>>>> App Engine is unreliable and looks more like a alpha- or beta- 
>>>>> cloudenvrionment....
>>>>>
>>>>> Please Google share you analysis with us.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Mos
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>> 2012/3/13 Sébastien Tromp <sebastien.tr...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Same thing here, since around an hour ago:
>>>>>> AppID: fiveorbsgame & fiveorbsgame-test
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Miroslav Genov <mge...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm encountering the same issue with HR app. The spike got started 
>>>>>>> in about ~1 hour from now. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> AppID: cmsevobg
>>>>>>> Datastore: HR
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:36:38 AM UTC+2, Richard Watson wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In case you're keeping track of issues thinking it's generally 
>>>>>>>> cleared up:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm on HR and have noticed higher latencies (couple seconds instead 
>>>>>>>> of e.g. 300ms) lately and sometimes higher error rates (a few instead 
>>>>>>>> of 
>>>>>>>> 0-3). Yesterday over about 6 hours I got a ton of 60-second requests 
>>>>>>>> that 
>>>>>>>> threw 500's with accompanying messages [1], usually on memcache sets 
>>>>>>>> hitting a deadline exceeded.  Also, over the last couple weeks I've 
>>>>>>>> been 
>>>>>>>> running 3 instances permanently despite sometimes shutting them down 
>>>>>>>> manually.  Usually I get by on one just fine with bursts of 2 or 3.  
>>>>>>>> I've 
>>>>>>>> noticed that one instance serves the majority of traffic with the 
>>>>>>>> other two 
>>>>>>>> serving maybe 50 requests over many hours, so the shutdown isn't 
>>>>>>>> aggressive 
>>>>>>>> enough.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "This request caused a new process to be started for your 
>>>>>>>> application..."
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> "A problem was encountered with the process that handled this 
>>>>>>>> request, causing it to exit" in the same request.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> App-id: 2dumo-hr
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:36:38 AM UTC+2, Richard Watson wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In case you're keeping track of issues thinking it's generally 
>>>>>>>> cleared up:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm on HR and have noticed higher latencies (couple seconds instead 
>>>>>>>> of e.g. 300ms) lately and sometimes higher error rates (a few instead 
>>>>>>>> of 
>>>>>>>> 0-3). Yesterday over about 6 hours I got a ton of 60-second requests 
>>>>>>>> that 
>>>>>>>> threw 500's with accompanying messages [1], usually on memcache sets 
>>>>>>>> hitting a deadline exceeded.  Also, over the last couple weeks I've 
>>>>>>>> been 
>>>>>>>> running 3 instances permanently despite sometimes shutting them down 
>>>>>>>> manually.  Usually I get by on one just fine with bursts of 2 or 3.  
>>>>>>>> I've 
>>>>>>>> noticed that one instance serves the majority of traffic with the 
>>>>>>>> other two 
>>>>>>>> serving maybe 50 requests over many hours, so the shutdown isn't 
>>>>>>>> aggressive 
>>>>>>>> enough.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "This request caused a new process to be started for your 
>>>>>>>> application..."
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> "A problem was encountered with the process that handled this 
>>>>>>>> request, causing it to exit" in the same request.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> App-id: 2dumo-hr
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  -- 
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "Google App Engine" group.
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/​​msg/google-appengine/-/​​YUHiXXkGPAgJ<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/YUHiXXkGPAgJ>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>>>>> google-appengine@googlegroups.​​com<google-appengine@googlegroups.com>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>> google-appengine+unsubscribe@​​googlegroups.com<google-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/​​group/google-appengine?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "Google App Engine" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>>>> google-appengine@googlegroups.​​com<google-appengine@googlegroups.com>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>> google-appengine+unsubscribe@​​googlegroups.com<google-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/​​group/google-appengine?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "Google App Engine" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>>> google-appengine@googlegroups.​​com<google-appengine@googlegroups.com>
>>>>> .
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> google-appengine+unsubscribe@​​googlegroups.com<google-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>>>>> .
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/​​group/google-appengine?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Johan Euphrosine (proppy)
>>>> Developer Programs Engineer
>>>> Google Developer Relations
>>>>  
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Google App Engine" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>> google-appengine@googlegroups.​​com <google-appengine@googlegroups.com>
>>>> .
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> google-appengine+unsubscribe@​​googlegroups.com<google-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/​​group/google-appengine?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/6xryHe41NVQJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Reply via email to