Look into backends. Jeff
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Ady <blacksyfo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I know this has been discussed before but there was no conclusion to > it (at least I couldn't find an acceptable workaround for that). My > problem is that the Singleton can't be implemented using GAE because > of it's instances. I need a storage where I can have different data > types that are faster then the database and all the instances have > access to it. > > A solution I read about is using the mem-cache, but I don't find it > acceptable because it can be emptied whenever it runs out of memory. > Do you have any idea how I can share a container of data among all the > instances without using databases ? > > Thanks guys > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
