>
> Thanks for the update Cayden... it's nice to know this issue is still 
> alive and high priority!
>
 

> For me the biggest issue with SNI is pre-ICS Android and Blackberry more 
> than IE (or Safari) with Windows-XP.  I can appreciate the desire and 
> temptation for an SNI solution but the reality is that there are still too 
> many non-compliant clients out there for SNI to be an adequate solution for 
> 99% of sites.  I wish SNI had been part of the original TLS spec but 
> unfortunately that isn't the case and we still have several years before 
> enough non-compliant clients are flushed from the ecosystem to make SNI a 
> viable solution.  Practically every Android phone (non Ice Cream Sandwich) 
> and many Android tablets including the Kindle Fire issue certificate 
> warnings with SNI today.  So if you care about Android / Kindle Fire / 
> Blackberry / IE-XP clients then SNI isn't for you.  The fact is if you use 
> SNI today your site will have an unprofessional blemish with the numerous 
> non-compliant clients and will result in a sub-standard user experience and 
> possibly support calls.
>
 

> So my hope is that Google keeps the SNI effort alive for future use but 
> makes VIP the recommended, affordable, and perhaps only solution for 
> today's GAE apps.  Since any non-trivial site should be using SSL today to 
> protect session data etc., I hope Google does the right thing to support 
> proper secure computing on its flagship platform.  I can only imagine the 
> cost and challenges involved with getting the VIP solution to work in the 
> cloud environment but every once in a while a feature comes along that you 
> just need to support because its the right thing to do and not to recoup 
> associate costs and make a big profit.  I would argue that (VIP) SSL is one 
> of those features.  It's something the GAE team can do simply because 
> they're Google and a leading steward of the Internet.  The alternate is to 
> pollute the web with certificate warnings, the majority of which will 
> likely be on its own Android platform.
>
 

> While we await this vital missing piece of an otherwise awesome GAE 
> platform you can test your client browsers responses to SNI here: 
>  https://sni.velox.ch/
>
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/7m0-QAOuQdUJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Reply via email to