mmm, i don't think it is a good idea. the quota will be shared too. 在 2012年6月13日星期三UTC+8下午10时38分34秒，Rick Mangi写道： > > He means that you can run multiple code bases on the same google app > engine application, they show up as different "versions" but they all share > the same backend services. > > So if you app is foo.appspot.com, you can have: > > app1.foo.appspot.com > app2.foo.appspot.com > app3.foo.appspot.com > > but only the "default" app is: > > foo.appspot.com > > > > On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 5:59:18 AM UTC-4, saintthor wrote: >> >> what is combine apps? >> >> i just stopped using cloud sql for pricing. >> >> thanks. >> >> 在 2012年6月12日星期二UTC+8下午10时57分49秒，barryhunter写道： >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:48 PM, saintthor <saintt...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > urlfetch? xmpp? any better ways? >>> >>> Depends a lot on what you want to share. How real time and what >>> payload size is. >>> >>> Another option is CloudSQL. A single sql instance can be accessed from >>> multiple app engine apps. >>> >>> Can also use the Remote API interface, but it just waps urlfetch. >>> >>> >>> Yet another option would be to combine apps, into one. Then you can >>> use task queues etc to communcate between the logicial >>> sub-applications. >>> >> >> 在 2012年6月12日星期二UTC+8下午10时57分49秒，barryhunter写道： >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:48 PM, saintthor <saintt...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > urlfetch? xmpp? any better ways? >>> >>> Depends a lot on what you want to share. How real time and what >>> payload size is. >>> >>> Another option is CloudSQL. A single sql instance can be accessed from >>> multiple app engine apps. >>> >>> Can also use the Remote API interface, but it just waps urlfetch. >>> >>> >>> Yet another option would be to combine apps, into one. Then you can >>> use task queues etc to communcate between the logicial >>> sub-applications. >>> >> >> 在 2012年6月12日星期二UTC+8下午10时57分49秒，barryhunter写道： >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:48 PM, saintthor <saintt...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > urlfetch? xmpp? any better ways? >>> >>> Depends a lot on what you want to share. How real time and what >>> payload size is. >>> >>> Another option is CloudSQL. A single sql instance can be accessed from >>> multiple app engine apps. >>> >>> Can also use the Remote API interface, but it just waps urlfetch. >>> >>> >>> Yet another option would be to combine apps, into one. Then you can >>> use task queues etc to communcate between the logicial >>> sub-applications. >>> >> >> 在 2012年6月12日星期二UTC+8下午10时57分49秒，barryhunter写道： >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:48 PM, saintthor <saintt...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > urlfetch? xmpp? any better ways? >>> >>> Depends a lot on what you want to share. How real time and what >>> payload size is. >>> >>> Another option is CloudSQL. A single sql instance can be accessed from >>> multiple app engine apps. >>> >>> Can also use the Remote API interface, but it just waps urlfetch. >>> >>> >>> Yet another option would be to combine apps, into one. Then you can >>> use task queues etc to communcate between the logicial >>> sub-applications. >>> >>
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/8NAXJLTvb7oJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
