Voted up on both as I see many benefits from having it On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 12:59:15 AM UTC, Gary Mort wrote: > > With the local SDK, static files have a special handler which can serve > their data without requiring the instance to be executing. > > It strikes me that it would be useful to allow for a redirect handler as > well. This would help for static files where you want to store the files > in a Google Storage Bucket so they can be updated without requiring a > deployment of a new version of the app code, as such I've submitted a > feature request for this in 10459. > https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=10459<https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?can=2&start=0&num=100&q=&colspec=ID%20Type%20Component%20Status%20Stars%20Summary%20Language%20Priority%20Owner%20Log&groupby=&sort=&id=10459> > > > By extension, it would also be useful to allow for a redirect handler to > google storage either dynamically or only if a GS object exists in order to > support caching. IE a PHP application could dynamically generate HTML for > a page, then save the html to Google Storage under a pre-determined object > name and in the future the redirect handler can access that instead: > https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=10460 > > Don't know if others would also like this, so I figured I'd post about the > requests here in case there is broader support. >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
