I really like the basic part of your framework, the python route config style and the simple view files.
For it is also based on servlet, I think it can't solve the warmup problem. Bit I would give it a try in my later new projects. On Monday, February 10, 2014 5:29:32 AM UTC+8, Nick wrote: > Hi Tapir, > > You could give porting your spring app over to the thundr framework a go: > http://3wks.github.io/thundr/ (usual disclaimer, I'm a maintainer) > > The basic concepts are very similar to spring, so it should be relatively > simple. Its designed specifically to have fast boot up times on appengine > (i.e. no classpath scanning etc). The easiest way to check it out is to > clone the sample app and run it in dev mode. > > https://github.com/3wks/thundr-sample > > Be aware that we're imminently coming up on the next major release > version, so the sample is a little 'out of date'. > You can get in touch directly with any questions from the docs page (or > join our google group) > > To the point directly, I think its totally infeasible to maintain any > reasonable sized java app without some framework. Besides Spring, i don't > feel there are many viable options. > > > > > On Friday, February 7, 2014 3:16:14 PM UTC+11, Tapir wrote: >> >> For the size of my project, I think it is impractical to port it to other >> languages. :( >> I tried python and go, their warmup time is very short. For python, it is >> less than one second, for go, it is less than 0.5 second I think. >> But Java still has a big advantage: large quantity of libraries. >> So if GAE team can make the warmup time of a pure jsp/servelt project be >> less than 1.5 seconds, I will be still happy to stick to Java. >> >> On Friday, February 7, 2014 2:28:04 AM UTC+8, Rafael Sanches wrote: >>> >>> Depends on the size of your project. >>> >>> I started with plain java/jsp. >>> >>> As the project grew the overhead of maintenance was so big that we opted >>> to moving everything to spring-mvc. >>> >>> That move increased the instance boot time from 7 to 35 seconds. In >>> order to overcome cold startups we had to add 6 extra "resident" instances. >>> It means a monthly $300 commitment just to run an MVC framework. >>> >>> Yes. It's frustrating and expensive. >>> >>> I wouldn't advising starting a java project in appengine. It seems >>> they're investing much more on other languages. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Rafa >>> On Feb 5, 2014 9:36 PM, "Tapir" <tapi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Is it worth dong it? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Google App Engine" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to google-appengi...@googlegroups.com. >>>> To post to this group, send email to google-a...@googlegroups.com. >>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
