Thanks for the reply! Can you be more specific? Our app is 132MB, I consider this rather large. I want to know if I'm shaving of at least 2-3s off the startup time before I'd go down this path.
On Wednesday, September 3, 2014 6:55:51 AM UTC+2, Vinny P wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:29 AM, stephanos <stephan...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> I was just wondering if it is worthwhile to reduce our Java app's >> dependency size by using ProGuard. >> >> Did you observe an effect to the startup time with ProGuard? >> > > > Yes, depending on the application. > > Some of my larger applications (that included a ton of external libraries > for speaking with other web services, frameworks, etc) benefited quite a > bit since some unused code could be cut out. But certain applications that > used very few libraries or were smaller in scale saw very minimal to no > difference in startup time. > > ----------------- > -Vinny P > Technology & Media Consultant > Chicago, IL > > App Engine Code Samples: http://www.learntogoogleit.com > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
