In addition, we are interested in whether or not adding another 5 threads will increase the overall rates, i.e. is the process for provisioning Groups using the same API actions as "regular" user provisioning, hitting the same services that might be affecting the limits?
In addition to the existing 5 threads, there are 5 threads that are dedicated to user provisioning and 1 for password sync. Are these additive? In other words, we would be going from 11 to 16 threads overall, would this help? On Friday, May 4, 2012 10:30:14 AM UTC-5, David Spangler wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a situation where we are attempting to populate around 90,000 > groups using 5 different threads against the Provisioning API. When we > started at 5pm last night, we had "expected" throughput of around 200-300 > users per minute processed. After 4 hours, the rates dropped more than in > half. Did we reach an API limit? If so, is it possible to request a lift > of this limit temporarily until all the Groups are provisioned? > > Attached is a graph of what last night looked like. > > Thanks for looking at this. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Apps Domain Information and Management APIs" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-apps-mgmt-apis/-/MSD9rGLQ6AcJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-apps-mgmt-apis?hl=en.
