I agree with celebird. There have been quite a few occassions I question the reason for storing data in separate files. Why not store it all in one big file? Or why not have a file for each item, creating millions of files?
Too many files, and things get out of control, one big file and we never know where to draw the line. About 5-10 categories defines the human ability to conceptualize things at the same time. Think of it as a happy number. On Sep 26, 5:23 am, Celebird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yes -- ten seems low -- but separate feed-files are intended more > to support different item-types, say housing and products, or > to split over 100,000 items per-feed; so, ten is quite reasonable. > > also, gdata "batch" simply collects multiple inserts > and then submits and executes them all at once -- > there's no file registration required as far as i know. > > unless we're taking about some other "batch" concept. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Base Data API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Base-data-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
