Thanks!
On Nov 27, 10:02 am, "Nicolas (Google)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Rob, > > There should not be any Client library special implementation about > this item. The attribute is still just text, just provide the > attribute correctly and it will be processed in the backend. > So I guess you could use an old Java library. > The Product Type Attribute - Google Base Help CenterThanks > You can learn more about this feature > here:http://base.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=66818 > > Cheers, > Nicolas > > On Nov 12, 10:56 pm, icebackhaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Wow, must have been in a weird state when I wrote that. > > > What I'm really asking is if the new, more structured approach to > > product_type values (i.e. general>moreSpecific) requires one to use a > > java library more recent than 1.20? Or, since it's still "just a > > string", does the older library still work just fine given the new > > style of string? > > > Hope that's clearer. > > > Thanks. > > > On Nov 11, 10:48 pm, icebackhaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I missed any news related to the API regarding the additional > > > structure one my now embed in the product_type slot. Do I need to get > > > a new release of the java library if I'm currently using 1.20? > > > > Thanks, --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Base Data API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Base-data-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
