Thanks for response. 3) Yes, 18 million or more. My customers create a lot of images, hense inhouse server costs can be high. 5) A single consolidated index is needed in case data needs to be segmented.
One other question that I didnlt ask but discovered in study of docs is security. The images being stored are confidential and must be secured. My study pointed out that base data is open to all? Image formats will not be a problem as I only store TIFF V4.0 and V6.0 and JPEG. Search criteria is text oriented rather than DB. field1 = nnn and field2 = fie* etc. Is sites on option if base data cannot be used? Thanks for the help. Bob On Mar 10, 4:40 am, Celebird <[email protected]> wrote: > does (3) mean eighteen-million items? > what does (5) mean exactly? > > google-base only supports five image formats so > something like photo-shop could not be attached. > > also, google-base doesn't behave as a relational database -- > features such as timeliness, relational integrity, join operations, > or an index-architecture shouldn't be expected. > > see also:http://code.google.com/apis/base/index.html --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Base Data API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Base-data-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
