quite the opposite. use your unique-product-id as the g:id during the api insert.
use the same unique-product-id as the id attribute value within the ftp feed file. ignore the atom:id returned from google -- that's an internal google-base identifier. although, storing the returned atom:id for future reference or use in other contexts is a good thing. that said, i wouldn't flip-flop between ftp and api -- it's fraught with danger unless all attributes, types, and values are kept exactly lock-step. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Base Data API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Base-data-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
