I'm getting an error 500 also when trying to insert the following
entry:

<atom:entry xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
        <atom:category scheme='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#kind'
                term='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#event' />
        <atom:title type='text'>DUOCAL MCT 1 BOTE 400G</atom:title>
        <gd:recurrence xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/
2005'>DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Madrid:20090901T113000

                DTEND;TZID=Europe/Madrid:20090901T113001

                RRULE:FREQ=DAILY;INTERVAL=1;UNTIL=20090902T000000

</gd:recurrence>
        <gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005'
                name='SOURCE' value='PORTAL' />
        <gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005'
                name='OWNER' value='66666666-A' />
        <gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005'
                name='Begin' value='2009-09-01T11:30:00.000+02:00' />
        <gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005'
                name='End' value='2009-09-02T00:00:00.000+02:00' />
        <gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005'
                name='Period' value='DAY' />
        <gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005'
                name='Frequency' value='1.0' />
        <gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005'
                name='OHA-ID' value='bbb0160c-e05a-46ee-b92a-c4659b72de5d' />
        <gd:where xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005'
                valueString='localhost:8080/c/w?u=null&amp;m=45' />
</atom:entry>

I don't know if it's the same error but I'm getting it when I set a
recurrence for the events, not when I insert an event that only occurs
once.

On Aug 31, 7:14 am, Ray Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Dave Riggle<[email protected]> wrote:
> > I think Google is unhappy that the start date would not be included in
> > the recurrence rule (September 7, 2008 was a Sunday). Can Trevor or
> > somebody confirm that is what's going on?
>
> > If that is indeed the case, Google is being overly pedantic. Nowhere
> > in RFC 2445 does it say the start date must fit the recurrence rule.
>
> Alternately, you could say that Google is being under pedantic. RFC
> 2445 specifically recognizes that recurring events can start on dates
> or time that do not conform to the recurrence rules. In section
> 4.8.5.4 you can find this example:
>
> Every other week on Monday, Wednesday and Friday until December 24,
>    1997, but starting on Tuesday, September 2, 1997:
>
>      DTSTART;TZID=US-Eastern:19970902T090000
>      RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;INTERVAL=2;UNTIL=19971224T000000Z;WKST=SU;
>       BYDAY=MO,WE,FR
>      ==> (1997 9:00 AM EDT)September 2,3,5,15,17,19,29;October
>      1,3,13,15,17
>          (1997 9:00 AM EST)October 27,29,31;November 10,12,14,24,26,28;
>                            December 8,10,12,22
>
> If indeed, Google is throwing 500s because of that, it is an error.
>
> Ray

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Calendar Data API" group.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-calendar-help-dataapi?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to