If you're going to use CalDAV, good luck. Google doesn't even come close to following the RFC. Yahoo comes closest to following the RFC, Google is hit and miss - mostly miss - and loads of frustration, workarounds, and special cases.
Charles. On Feb 5, 5:36 pm, aldana <[email protected]> wrote: > I want to write client and am a bit unsure whether to use the more RFC > standard CalDAV or the google-api. My guess is that google-calendar api is > more powerful because customized for google calendar itself (less > abstractions necessary, no need for "over-abstractions"). > > Anyway my purpose is to write a client only google calendar so being RFC > standard argument doesn't count for me. What are the pros/cons of feature > richness of CalDAV vs. google-calender api? > > Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Calendar Data API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://code.google.com/apis/calendar/community/forum.html
