One thing you can do is changing your axis scaling chxr=1,0,13362 into chxr=1,0,13362,2000
On Dec 2, 9:18 am, Tristan McCann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > Forgive me if this has been mentioned previously. I have searched the > archives but have not found this specific issue. > > I have a chart with two data sets. The data sets and the Y-axis are > scaled from 0 to 13362. The data scales properly. > > The axis is scaled, but at a chart size of 240x200, the top label ends > at 12000. This causes the axis to not line up with the data. > > In preparing this message, I changed the size of the example chart to > 600x500 (max pixels). In this case, the top label ends at 13000. This > makes the data line up better, even though it still isn't exact. > > I realize that 13362 is not a great data/axis scale. I want to > implement a proper ceiling function to make the API use my top number, > so the scaling is exact. Would ceiling the number to two significant > figures (in this case, 14000) work across the board? I am also > wondering in smaller (9132 rounding to 9200) and larger (143323 > rounding to 150000) cases what the API should do. > > Incorrectly scaled > graph:http://chart.apis.google.com/chart?chs=240x200&cht=bvg&chbh=r,0,1.0&c...4148,4761,5238,5716,6074&chxl=0:|2004|2005|2006|2007|2008&chxr=1,0,13362&chds=0,13362 > > More-correctly scaled > graph:http://chart.apis.google.com/chart?chs=600x500&cht=bvg&chbh=r,0,1.0&c...4148,4761,5238,5716,6074&chxl=0:|2004|2005|2006|2007|2008&chxr=1,0,13362&chds=0,13362 > > The only difference between these graphs is the size. Notice that the > first value for the second data set is 4148, and is shown as <4000 in > the first chart. > > Thank you, > Tristan McCann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Chart API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-chart-api?hl=en.
