On Dec 24, 4:02 pm, Ben Collins-Sussman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 2:34 PM, David Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > For "normal" releases (eg. version numbers, not snapshots, expected to
> > be available indefinitely for archival purposes), the file size should
> > not be a problem. The default project settings would not work, but we
> > should be able to reconfigure yours to support 200-300M releases, with
> > a larger overall quota. However, for snapshots, I don't think that
> > project hosting at Google Code has a solution for you at this time.
>
> To clarify: we *are* working to support your use case of nightly
> 'snapshots', but we're not there yet. For now, you may want to use
> googlecode for 'final' releases, and put nightly builds elsewhere
> (like sourceforge).
Any SWAG on a timeframe for that?
It's interesting that you're looking to add a snapshot service.
Sourceforge had one, and they shut it down, instead telling users to
just use the normal FRS (file release system) for snapshots. You guys
are going the other way :) :) To each his own, eh?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Hosting at Google Code" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-code-hosting?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
