Hi Siddiq, Nice job! BTW, how did you extract the data from code jam dashboard? Did you use any script again?
I am learning on some web stuff. So, want to know :-) Thanks, Vivek On Sep 6, 1:09 pm, Siddiq Akbar <sid...@gmail.com> wrote: > @vexorian > I agree with you, everybody who achieved 99 score is more meaningful. > I have removed the top 100 and top 50... > Instead I added the list with all participants who achieved 99 score grouped > by > country...http://siddiq-technology.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-code-jam-qualifi... > > And a complete list just for fun... and find your > name...http://siddiq.info/jam2009/all-participants-google-code-jam-2009-qual... > > > > On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 3:14 AM, vexorian <vexor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Those rankings are biased as the start time of the round was > > friendlier for US and also my country. Many European and Asian > > contestants started later. > > > I think it would be more meaningful to see the percentages of each > > country considering everybody who achieved 99, not just top 100. > > > Nevertheless, this bias problem won't apply for the next rounds, and > > it would be nice these stats were published for the next rounds. > > > On Sep 4, 3:53 pm, Siddiq Akbar <sid...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Here are some nice statistics... > >http://siddiq-technology.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-code-jam-qualifi... > > > > USA rocked on the charts for top positions... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-codejam" group. To post to this group, send email to google-code@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
