Hi!

Thank you very much! That solved it.
Is it your code, @Christopher Chen?

Stephan


On Mar 10, 10:36 pm, Christopher Chen <tikitikireve...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> If you're having trouble with the 'winning' solution, try going to
> line 44 and replacing "0" with "0.0".
>
> -Chris
>
> On Mar 9, 3:47 pm, Bartholomew Furrow <fur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Whose solution was it?  One round we had a contestant who used an unusual
> > compiler, and had a solution that didn't work in gcc.  Maybe this is that
> > one?
>
> > On Mar 8, 2010 7:02 AM, "Stephan09" <stephan.ribe...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello!
>
> > I was practicing with some old problems and tried to solve the Center
> > of Mass Problem of Round 1C - B in 2009.
> > I correctly understand the solution and the winning c++ codes. But
> > when I compile the winning codes on my pc and calculate the solutions
> > for the practice input, I allways get that the submitted solution is
> > incorrect.
>
> > Does anyone know how that can be? I didnt change any of the code. Is
> > it possible that, when using c++, the calculated values depend on the
> > processor in use?
> > Thus, is it possible that one has to write different c++ codes for
> > different processors?
>
> > Thanx a lot!
> > Stephan
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "google-codejam" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to google-c...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-code%2bunsubscr...@googlegr 
> > oups.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-codejam" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-c...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en.

Reply via email to