On Jun 3, 9:31 pm, Sumudu <sumu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hear hear! > > Also, jbernadas, I used the command line tool for subsequent rounds > without any problems so probably there was something a bit funky with > how the qualification round was set up.
Yes, the problem was specific to that round because the A only had a small input. But a fix is coming soon! > On May 31, 11:19 pm, Luke Pebody <luke.peb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > May I just say that "my child was born two months ago" and "I think > > (this awesome tool which is of little self-benefit for me to work on) > > will be ready for round 3" is a VERY impressive combination. > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:13 AM, jbernadas <jberna...@google.com> wrote: > > > Sorry for that, my child was born two months ago so I'm not working on the > > > problems this year. Also, I was on parental leave and missed this thread. > > > Anyway, my fault. > > > > tl;dr: I'm working on a fix to allow the commandline tool to accept > > > problems > > > with any kind of I/O sets. I think it will be ready for Round 3. > > > > Half of the fix is done which is exposing the required data in the server. > > > The other half, updating the commandline tool to use this new information, > > > is complete but it requires some extra testing. > > > > The issue was that it assumed that all problems have exactly one small and > > > one large I/O set when parsing the user status and submissions. Did you > > > try > > > using the -f flag? That flag skips the checks that use that information > > > and > > > tries to submit directly. > > > > The new version will not make any kind of assumptions about the I/O sets, > > > so > > > it should be more robust. The only assumption it will make is that the > > > only > > > kind of inputs are small and large, which I hope will be more persistent. > > > > On Saturday, April 14, 2012 9:25:51 PM UTC-7, Vexorian wrote: > > > >> I had a couple of issues with the tool during the qualification. > > >> Wondering > > >> if it was just me or if anyone else experienced them. > > > >> I was surprised it did not have any issue downloading and submitting > > >> problem A, as it has a different format and all that. > > > >> When I tried to solve B, I was able to download B-small and B-large, but > > >> it would not let me upload. It said that I did not download the test case > > >> before uploading, so I had to submit manually. The same happened with C. > > >> I > > >> did not even try with D-small. > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Google Code Jam" group. > > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-code/-/XzpiEfHbsWAJ. > > > To post to this group, send email to google-code@googlegroups.com. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To post to this group, send email to google-code@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en.
