Hi Yury,
It's not exactly true. If you run the query for let's say 51, there will be
much less results starting with digits 6-9 than for let'say 99. So, you can't
assign the digits randomly, but according to their frequencies.
Ch.
==============================================================================
On Wed, 6 May 2020, Юрий Горшенин wrote:
Hello,
during round 1C I succeeded to solve TestSet1 and TestSet2, but failed to
solve TestSet3 for the problem "Overrandomized". For the TestSet3 I tried
to do following: just collect all characters from leading positions of
responses and assign them arbitrary to digits, except zero (as server
respond without leading zeros, according to problem statement). Then,
assign rest of characters to the rest of digits. This solution received WA,
but I don't understand why - IMHO any valid assignment of characters to
digits should work for TestSet3, as upper bounds are unknown.
Thanks, Yury.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google
Code Jam" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-code/d2e9cb2f-9489-4c00-9de3-35ff6e61a213%40googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google
Code Jam" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-code/alpine.LSU.2.21.2005061851200.4600%40triangle.
