Anyone at Google: Ok, so with some trial and error, I've got it working. A couple of things:
1) Your documentation isn't clear. According to your document the header should look like this: POST /feeds/acl/private/full/document%3A<your document id> HTTP/1.1 Host: docs.google.com Authorization: <your authorization header here> But it will fail if you don't include a content type. So you should include that in your example. Also I think you should make a note that if you are planning on using acls you need to include a separate scope item when creating the token. I thought that the ACL would be included in the docs scope because the ACL is part of the document, it wasn't until I got the error that I added the additional scope. 2) There doesn't appear to be any way to add multiple ACLs at once. I tried: <entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"; xmlns:gAcl='http:// schemas.google.com/acl/2007'> <category scheme='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#kind' term='http://schemas.google.com/acl/2007#accessRule'/> <gAcl:role value='writer'/> <gAcl:scope type='user' value='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'/> </entry> <entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"; xmlns:gAcl='http:// schemas.google.com/acl/2007'> <category scheme='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#kind' term='http://schemas.google.com/acl/2007#accessRule'/> <gAcl:role value='writer'/> <gAcl:scope type='user' value='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'/> </entry> --- AND --- <feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"; xmlns:gAcl='http:// schemas.google.com/acl/2007'> <entry> <category scheme='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#kind' term='http://schemas.google.com/acl/2007#accessRule'/> <gAcl:role value='writer'/> <gAcl:scope type='user' value='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'/> </entry> <entry> <category scheme='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#kind' term='http://schemas.google.com/acl/2007#accessRule'/> <gAcl:role value='writer'/> <gAcl:scope type='user' value='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'/> </entry> </feed> And a few others, all resulted in "permission denied". I've programed around it by submitting a request for each e-mail. But this can be very slow, and it is just wasteful on both our parts. On Nov 4, 4:25 pm, tazz_ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Folks - > > I'm about to work on implementing the new ACL features, but I had a > couple things that I'm not clear on. Ok, the example in the docs is: > > POST /feeds/acl/private/full/document%3A<your document id> HTTP/1.1 > Host: docs.google.com > Authorization: <your authorization header here> > > <entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"; xmlns:gAcl='http:// > schemas.google.com/acl/2007'> > <category scheme='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#kind' > term='http://schemas.google.com/acl/2007#accessRule'/> > <gAcl:role value='writer'/> > <gAcl:scope type='user' value='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'/> > </entry> > > But lets say I have a list of three people that I want to grant access > to, could I do this? > > POST /feeds/acl/private/full/document%3A<your document id> HTTP/1.1 > Host: docs.google.com > Authorization: <your authorization header here> > > <entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"; xmlns:gAcl='http:// > schemas.google.com/acl/2007'> > <category scheme='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#kind' > term='http://schemas.google.com/acl/2007#accessRule'/> > <gAcl:role value='writer'/> > <gAcl:scope type='user' value='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'/> > </entry> > <entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"; xmlns:gAcl='http:// > schemas.google.com/acl/2007'> > <category scheme='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#kind' > term='http://schemas.google.com/acl/2007#accessRule'/> > <gAcl:role value='writer'/> > <gAcl:scope type='user' value='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'/> > </entry> > <entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"; xmlns:gAcl='http:// > schemas.google.com/acl/2007'> > <category scheme='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#kind' > term='http://schemas.google.com/acl/2007#accessRule'/> > <gAcl:role value='writer'/> > <gAcl:scope type='user' value='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'/> > </entry> > > Also what happens if my modification conflicts with an existing role? > So let's say in the above that [EMAIL PROTECTED] already is a > collaborator. Would [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > [EMAIL PROTECTED] still be granted access? In essence, do I > always have to retrieve the ACL to see what's currently going on, or > if my only interest is that there are particular collaborators (and > don't care if there is more), is actually faster to just post those > permissions? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Docs Data APIs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Docs-Data-APIs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
