Yea, warp-servlet used to support them. But there are a lot of subtleties with the lifecycle (firing init() outside request scope, destroy() on no-scope servlets etc.) and since the common servlet idiom is to have one shared instance and build request-scoped logic on top of that I think this is simpler.
Jesse was also of this opinion. Dhanji. On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Bob Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Dhanji R. Prasanna <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> The servlet specification implies everything is a singleton (as >> opposed to the alternative single-thread model). > > It didn't used to, and I don't see a reason for imposing that restriction at > all here. In fact, I see a lot of value in request-scoped servlets. > > Bob > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
