Comment #30 on issue 258 by bslesinsky: [Patch] custom annotation based injection points http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=258
It seems like there are two issues here: 1) standardizing on common names for things (e.g. naming injection points) 2) the code that implements this standard. Guice is both a (de-facto) standard and an implementation. If you're not using Guice's annotations, you're not following the Guice standard, but rather some other standard. It seems perfectly reasonable for someone to write code to some other standard and even to embed the Guice core into a dependency engine for some other standard, but we don't want to confuse people about what the Guice standard actually is. It should be obvious that you're doing something non-standard (from Guice's point of view). -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
