How strange! =) On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Max Bowsher <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 07/07/10 01:29, Dhanji R. Prasanna wrote: > > Does it? It only installs PersistenceFilter if you specify unit of work > > as request. So in a non-servlet app it will never load that class. > > > > We might do as you suggest anyway though--haven't quite finalized the > > design of how PersistFilter should work.. > > I'm not thinking of a non-servlet app - rather I'm thinking of a servlet > application that wants to use guice-persist in UnitOfWork.REQUEST mode, > but doesn't want to involve guice-servlet. > > Max. > > > > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Max Bowsher <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Currently guice-persist *requires* the use of guice-servlet. > > > > I can easily envisage an application where someone wanted to use > > guice-persist, but was happy with pure web.xml-based servlet > > configuration. > > > > To not needlessly inhibit, this, I think the PersistenceFilter class > > should be changed from package-private to public, such that it can be > > installed directly in web.xml, not only via PersistModule. > > > > Max. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.
