Bob,
Cool - that's what I was thinking was the "right" way to do it, but
was just curious if there was another way
Patrick
On Oct 21, 7:58 am, Bob Lee <crazybob...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Patrick Lightbody
> <patr...@lightbody.net>wrote:
>
> > But then I was thinking, it'd be cool if I could somehow @Inject this:
>
> > @Named("foo.vm") Provider<Template> templateProvider
> > ...
> > Template template = templateProvider.get();
>
> > Then my provider would somehow be able to detect that it should be
> > associated with "foo.vm" and return the right value.
>
> > Is something like this possible?
>
> We usually encourage developers to bind things explicitly up front. That
> way, we can catch errors ASAP. In this case, you might consider iterating
> over all of your .vm files and creating bindings to them (I'd probably drop
> the ".vm" part).
>
> Bob
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-guice@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-guice+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
