If you like you can try the experimental lifecycle module which takes an executor and calls a bunch of services in parallel. See this test for an example: http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/browse/trunk/lifecycle/test/com/google/inject/lifecycle/ParallelizedBroadcastTest.java
Dhanji. On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:24 AM, William Pietri <will...@scissor.com> wrote: > Tim Peierls wrote: > > Actually, it's worse than that: Even with a latch, the Guice internals > > are so aggressively single-threaded that this approach doesn't work at > > all -- the trivial demonstration only works because of the uninjected > > custom provider. What a shame. > > > > Sorry if I got any hopes up. :-( > > > > --tim > > Thanks, Tim. You did get my hopes up, but that's ok; this year's > disappointments are next year's shiny new technologies. > > Do you have an opinion on Jesse's proposed solution, the one involving > Guava? I don't yet know enough about Guice's internals to know whether > your discovery means that his approach would also founder on the same > rocks you uncovered. > > Thanks, > > William > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-gu...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-guice+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-guice%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to google-gu...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-guice+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=.
