On Dec 31, 2:58 pm, "Dhanji R. Prasanna" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 11:47 AM, JN <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'm looking seriously into the possibility of using guice for our
> > project.  However, I'm extremely reluctant to pepper our interfaces
> > and implementation classes with guice injections (based on various
> > principles and practical concerns, I don't find it a good idea).  I'd
> > like to use guice without using annotations, although I suspect it's
> > not possible.
> > Skimming the documentation, it seems like most of the annotations can
> > be obviated by doing more work in the module.  However, doing an
> > injection (I'd prefer constructor injection) seems to *require* the
> > @Inject annotation.  Is there any way around this?
>
> Yes, you can use @Provides methods on your module or bind().toConstructor()
> without any annotations at all.

Thanks for the quick reply.  Does that bind to a no-arg constructor,
or how do you specify which constructor to bind to?  A pointer to docs
or javadoc would be helpful.  I tried to answer that question for
myself, but couldn't find toConstructor() in the javadoc.  I explored
AbstractModule ->bind() -> to()... At this point, all I see is to(),
toInstance(), toProvider().

>
> > Are people happy with the annotations-mandatory approach?  Is there no
> > demand for alternate means of configuration?  I'd rather just specify
> > everything explicitly in the module, even if it's a little more
> > verbose.
>
> Generally the objection is of the pedantic form,

Thanks for that. ;)

> very few of our users
> actually experience problems with using annotations, and on the contrary
> find them useful in self-documenting and error-checking.

I won't open up that discussion here. :)

Jim

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.


Reply via email to