On 27 Jan., 23:44, Bob Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > I would just construct MyGuiceApp directly, passing it mocks. You > don't need Guice in your unit tests. > > Bob
Ok thanks for the tip! This was also the approach that could be picked up from this post: http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice/browse_thread/thread/21e9185604ca2a45/dd8f9490931700bc?lnk=gst&q=testing#dd8f9490931700bc But if my unit-test are supposed to be guice free what is the purpose of guiceberry: http://code.google.com/p/guiceberry/ Or am I confusing this with something else? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
