oeh and the link for it:) http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/2.0.x/reference/jdbc.html(could'nt find the 3.0 article)
2010/3/13 nino martinez wael <[email protected]> > Hmm could'nt we just use the spring jdbc template? > > Maybe just using, http://code.google.com/p/guiceyfruit/ ? > > regards Nino > > 2010/3/7 Alen Vrečko <[email protected]> > > Looks a bit complicated. My original implementation is locked away. >> But from memory this is what I had in mind http://pastie.org/858152 >> and test http://pastie.org/858153. No seal of approval thou. >> >> Maybe bklough can share their implementation. Sounds like they have a >> polished jdbc support. >> >> HTH >> Alen >> >> On Mar 7, 5:04 am, Kartik Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I apologize in advance for the long winded email. By Alen's suggestion, >> I >> > first tried to get a thread local connection instance to be injected. So >> I >> > first copied an implementation of ThreadLocalScope from Guice Custom >> Scope >> > implementationhttp://pastie.org/857790. >> > Then I injected this scope into my ThreadLocalConnectionProvider to >> inject >> > the scope to provide initial seed value and to provide fall back >> connection >> > instancehttp://pastie.org/857829. To get a thread local connection >> > instance, I call the scope method of my scope implementation. My modules >> > binding is given here.http://pastie.org/857810. >> > My unit tests work as in I get the same connection instance every time. >> > My question is related to exception handling. I inject data source to >> any >> > Provider that requires a connection. DataSource#getConnection() throws >> > SQLException in its method signature. So in my get() implementation, I >> have >> > to swallow it or throw unchecked exception in its place as it I have >> done in >> > my example. I know that I can used ThrowingProviders, but scope method >> does >> > not allow an implementation of that interface as one of its method >> argument. >> > Is there a better way to do this write this implementation or am I stuck >> > with what I have? >> > >> > Kartik >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Alen Vrečko <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > The @Retry just calls the method again if exception is thrown. Just >> > > need to make sure the RetryInterceptor is the first one installed to >> > > avoid any surprises. >> > >> > > In my case the database server got restarted from time to time. That >> > > is nothing special but didn't want the Connection Pool to validate >> > > connections all the time, therefore ConnectionClosedException happens. >> > > But the @Retry just calls the method again, the CP is smart enough to >> > > give a good connection the second time, and the user doesn't get en >> > > error. >> > >> > > Cheers >> > > Alen >> > >> > > On 1 mar., 16:46, Kartik Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > @Alen What is @Retry annotation? Was this one of the application >> specific >> > > > annotations that you implemented? >> > >> > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Eelco Hillenius >> > > > <[email protected]>wrote: >> > >> > > > > > Just curious, when would you not need a transaction? >> > >> > > > > I guess I should say that you don't always want to turn off >> autocommit >> > > > > (transaction per execution instead of per annotated method). And >> > > > > thinking about it it, maybe there is no good reason. >> > >> > > > > Eelco >> > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > > Groups >> > > > > "google-guice" group. >> > > > > To post to this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > > > > [email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]> >> <google-guice%[email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]> >> > >> > > <google-guice%2bunsubscr...@google groups.com> >> > > > > . >> > > > > For more options, visit this group at >> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. >> > >> > > -- >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> > > "google-guice" group. >> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > > [email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]> >> <google-guice%[email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]> >> > >> > > . >> > > For more options, visit this group at >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "google-guice" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
