>It is about fully implementing javax.inject 100% (does it?) Yes (as said before)
>documenting how the javax.inject implementation works (anything there ?) Yes (in the javadoc of javax.inject, and same as Guice's documentation) >and about being production-stable (nightly's very seldom are) Yes (used internally at Google) sam On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:28 AM, mortench <[email protected]> wrote: > it is not only about providing downloads. It is about fully > implementing javax.inject 100% (does it?), documenting how the > javax.inject implementation works (anything there ?) and about being > production-stable (nightly's very seldom are) ? > > Until you can say yes to all 3 things, I stand by my definition of > javax.inject not being supported by google guice. > > /Morten > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
