Seems like a variant of the common robot legs issue: http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#How_do_I_build_two_similar_but_slightly_different_trees_of_objec
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Dan <csniki...@google.com> wrote: > Hello everyone. > > I have an object that takes several injected arguments. All of them are > provided by separate modules. The last argument is actually provided by two > different modules - A and B. I have an injector that is created from all of > these modules. I want to create two different instances of an object - one > whose last argument came from module A, and the other whose last argument > from module B. All the other arguments are the same. > > I solved it by making an annotated @Provides method in each of the modules > where they make the last argument @Named after their own, leaving the rest > untouched. > > But I feel like this is not a good solution, because I don't want modules > A and B to even know how many arguments there are in the object's > constructor. Is there a way I could say something like "For a class X, bind > it's argument of type Y to such annotated instance" without specifying > anything about other arguments? > > Thanks! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-guice/-/wqvXqFOZ4HUJ. > To post to this group, send email to google-guice@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-guice+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to google-guice@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-guice+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
