I should've read the example more closely, I guess the example is the other
way around (injecting a B into A so that A can get access to C through B).
Either way, I'm sure that assisted inject is a better practice ;).

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Nate Bauernfeind <[email protected]
> wrote:

> I'm going to point you in the direction of a Guice best-practice guideline
> which strongly suggests not doing what you've chosen to do.
>
> https://github.com/google/guice/wiki/InjectOnlyDirectDependencies
>
> Specifically, months down the road what if MyObject also needs a
> BarService? And then a BazService? Now you're going to have a bunch of
> hand-written specific code to do exactly what Guice is supposed to do for
> you for free. When does the madness end?! =)
>
> Good luck,
> Nate
>
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Kevin Burton <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I think I answered my own question :-P
>>
>> I think the strategy is to always inject in the constructor.  This way
>> the entire application won't startup.
>>
>> Even if it's rarely used, having it from the start of the application
>> will fix these problems and your app won't compile without this object in
>> the constructor.
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 9:33:42 PM UTC-7, Kevin Burton wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm curious what the best practice is here.
>>>
>>> Let's say that deep in your code you wanted to create a new instance of
>>> MyObject and pass it a FooService...
>>>
>>> One could use an injector to do this.. but what if we actually forgot to
>>> bind anything to FooService?
>>>
>>> You would deploy your application, it would be running just fine for
>>> months, then all of a sudden you would need FooService and your app would
>>> fail.
>>>
>>> How does one avoid that scenario?
>>>
>>> If you used explicitly provided dependencies, your app would fail at
>>> compilation time.
>>>
>>> Now we've postponed to fail at run time.. which is not fun.
>>>
>>> Any solutions here?
>>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "google-guice" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/579a3e9d-c1b6-47f2-b21b-8a7b0f56824b%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/579a3e9d-c1b6-47f2-b21b-8a7b0f56824b%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/CAHNex98L0x6643dryK5KBRDbeMED2%3D90%3D77Bj8Q7xgks2S2DAg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to