AH!! Gotcha.  OK.  That rocks.. I'll look into that now.

On Thursday, October 16, 2014 12:35:17 PM UTC-7, Sam Berlin wrote:
>
> So long as you have no code that has @Inject Injector (and then later 
> calls .getInstance(Something.class), because Guice can't statically detect 
> that), then calling Guice.createInjector(MyModule(), Stage.TOOL) should 
> fail if you're missing dependencies.
>
> sam
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Kevin Burton <burto...@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> I don't follow.. I can't parse your sentence.  
>>
>> On Thursday, October 16, 2014 11:03:36 AM UTC-7, Sam Berlin wrote:
>>>
>>> If you don't inject the injector anyway, wouldn't creating the injector 
>>> (in Stage.TOOL if you want to prevent creating anything) cover this?
>>>
>>> sam
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Kevin Burton <burto...@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is there an easy way to require that your dependencies are met without 
>>>> actually having to call getInstance or have an instance of an object?
>>>>
>>>> This should be easy since I can build a graph of the connections 
>>>> between Classes.
>>>>
>>>> Some of my instances require complex init and external dependencies 
>>>> like Cassandra and ActiveMQ... I don't to have to require these in my unit 
>>>> tests because they are hefty.
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to inject Session which is a Cassandra object bound to a given 
>>>> connection... but of course I would have to create that object manually.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a cleaner way to do this?
>>>>
>>>> This way I could have some basic tests for production bindings to make 
>>>> sure the bindings are complete and all dependencies met.
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "google-guice" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to google-guice...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to google...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>>> msgid/google-guice/1e68a134-5614-446f-9463-6a500c8f7ca2%
>>>> 40googlegroups.com 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/1e68a134-5614-446f-9463-6a500c8f7ca2%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "google-guice" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to google-guice...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to google...@googlegroups.com 
>> <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/df13a3d1-b50c-4e0e-aad7-ff27bc8cff9a%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/df13a3d1-b50c-4e0e-aad7-ff27bc8cff9a%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-guice+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-guice@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-guice/55c26217-4853-48a5-b66a-c7dc5c8763ac%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to