* RJT <[email protected]> [11-16-10 19:05]: > > So. picasa should still be in the repository, at least in the testing > or beta. Software repositories are what makes open source operating > systems so much less expensive to manage. Windows can not compete > with Linux/BSD when it comes to Patch management. What happened to > all google employees need to use Linux? Finding and Downloading and > Installing and Updating takes way too much time. Please put picasa > updates in the repositories.
I don't understand why you would expect a windows exe file to be in a linux repository? > This is what shows up on my Fedora box after running: > yum --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=google* list | grep -i goog > picasa.i386 3.0.5744-02 @google- > testing Who said that google maintained linux files? The 3.0 ver is just the windows version with an included wine. just for you, picasa3[6,8]-setup.exe is available here: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/picasa38-setup.exe http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/picasa36-setup.exe but I will not leave them there long. -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google-Labs-Picasa-for-Linux" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-labs-picasa-for-linux?hl=en.
