On Sep 1, 12:18 pm, Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think the "uncertainty" and "lack of direction and clarity" from > Google will make me move to Yahoo/Microsoft maps.
This is something that Pamela may wish to take back to the lawyers... A worthwhile addition to the TOU would be a list of uses which are definitely allowed and a list of uses which are definitely forbidden. Naturally new technology (like the iPhone) would mean that new uses could be added to one or other of those lists; and changes in Google's licences from their suppliers could move uses from one list to the other. But it would make developers' lives easier. FWIW, I think I disagree with Dawn. I don't think the crucial question is whether the *app* is freely available to all; the TOU require the API to be used to display a map on a website which is freely available. If you have a fancy browser and your code allows that fancy browser to do stuff which can't be done in IE say, while still using the API [that bit is important], then fine. It doesn't mean that the map breaks the Terms of Use. But I'm willing to be corrected... Andrew --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Maps-API@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
