Hi Ben--

As already confirmed, modifying the output of the Static Maps API on
the server isn't permitted.

Anyway, I really wanted to jump in so I can plug my static maps experiment:
http://gmaps-samples.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/staticmaps/imagemapmaker.html

It creates a static map plus traditional image map (<area>) based on
an interactive map and a JSON of poly data.
It combines nicely with the mapper.js, which adds auto rollover to
images with image maps:
http://www.netzgesta.de/mapper/
Or it also combines with a smaller canvas-only (excanvas in IE)
library that I wrote to do the same thing:
http://ernestdelgado.com/trash/canvasonstatic/imagemapcanvas.html

You can see it in action in the "News by State" tab here:
http://www.google.com/2008election/

- pamela

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 6:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Funnily enough, I will also be using the chart api in this app!
> Everywhere I look I find another use for another Google API (I'm
> hoping that I'll find more uses if I get to the developer day. I've
> registered, but not heard anything other than confirmation I have
> registered, has anyone else?)
>
>
>> I would like to be able to draw dynamic polys on static maps legally.
>> It can be done illegally using Google's "mld" server.  It uses the
>> same encoding scheme used by "formEncoded" polys applied to integer
>> pixels rather than floating point Lat/Lon coordinates.  The X & Y
>> elements are reversed.  A checksum of "9999" is added to the end.
>
> I have used your js stuff as a basis for generating complex polylines
> as images. It's .NET, but if you'd like the code I will tidy it up and
> post it. In my system it's connected to a database that stores
> boundaries as Lat/Lng points & generates the image based on the size &
> centre point, using your maths.
>
> I'm hoping Pamela's still here, but what I'd really like to do is
> generate the static image & draw the boundaries onto the gif (or png),
> cache the result and serve the edited file on my site. This would mean
> it loads much quicker and we're not hitting the google servers as
> often.
> As long as the google logo and trademark on the bottom aren't
> obsucred, would that be a problem, or must I have the boundary as a
> seperate image?
>
> Cheers
>
> Ben
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Maps API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to