Hello smourt, I had many problems with javascript (still do on many web languages) and I became very frustrated too. Maybe you've been through it already but I found W3C tutorials very helpful for a beginner, and I still go back and review the simplest things:
http://www.w3schools.com/js/default.asp Seriously you won't regret spending time at W3C. On Oct 5, 2:55 pm, smourt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Whatever man, I am trying here.... there seriously is no attempt to do > anything other than understand and learn if you feel the need to > lambast me for... trying and trying to direct a question to the source > of the tutorial... whatever...!!!! I will keep trying and when I > succeed I'll post the resultant link... > > Seriously? I am not about to get into a debate about whos has got a > bigger... etc I have seen it so many times and refuse to get > involved... > > When you visit the photography forums I subscribe to I will be sure to > not judge you and however misdirected your question... Lance I'll be > sure to help... > > Nothing more nothing less... > > As for the previous link... I referenced it... What more do you want > form me??? > > As for your text above let me correct you... you are so quick to > judge.... > > I did supply a link to what is up till now been a stretch for me, my > best effort, yet relative to most on this site, a pathetic effort. I > did follow the guideline which stated I should NOT post code. I > assumed referencing the code I have been working on would be better > than what I kept messing up... > > WHY WHY WHY Judge so harshly? Seriously? Who hurt you or offended you? > > About the first thread... As stated, I linked to it, I felt that the > people who did post replies were missing what I was trying to > convey...I appreciated their attempt, dont get me wrong. > > By directing the question to mike I assumed in the spirit of the forum > he would have more than likely understood straight away and could/ > would have directed me elsewhere on the forum which would have put me > on the right track... > > I take offence at being told I am in it for a freebie...I am happy to > be proud of my own work and gaining a sense of achievement out of > it... > > LANCE in order to understand where you are coming from I looked at > your most recent post... I am not suprised by the outcome... > > You are criticising someone else...!!!! What's with that??? Let people > be... help or dont help... no need to be a policeman when none is > needed... Sure in many peoples opinion he was probably at fault... > > What I find humourous, given the situation is that your respose to the > post: > > "v2.129e pushed as v2, v2.130d pushed as v2 - No changes yet Options" > > is...be a policeman!!! > > Chill man life is good... > > To anyone else who chose to read to this point... I apologise if I > offended you in any way...by handling it the way I have, sure I have > not been particularly pleasant in response to Lance Dyas / Garthan > (same person) I dont care much for the self elected policeman type... > > To those who have contributed by trying to assist me, A BIG THANK > YOU!!!! > > By all means criticise me some more but I will not reply... Life has > more pleasures... > > On Oct 5, 3:33 pm, Lance Dyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > smourt wrote: > > > By now I have no idea if it is a random typo or just not getting the > > > concept. > > > How do you expect anyone else to "guess" the above? > > > "yeah you have a random typo on line 84 of your code mash because > > you failed to understand javascript syntax regarding function nesting > > and after you fix that your icons all will be same because you failed > > to understand another concept which I could point to > > in a third tutorial" but ... we cant do that > > > Effectively you refuse to follow the group posting > > guidelines .... and the new thread thing seems like > > you are dodging the request by those who where > > trying to help you on the first thread.... > > > Causing probably a couple people to ask why > > should I try to help? > > > You do not provide anyone a link to your best attempt ... > > You have only described what you need.. and not a problem. > > So the best guess becomes you havent made any attempts > > and simply want a difmff.("do it for me for free") > > > that may not be true.. but you havent provided any > > basis for someone to help you with a problem. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
